|
From: Mayan Metzler [mailto:mmetzler@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009
8:51 AM
To: Mackay, Michael; Lior Noy; Mackay, Meggan; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS
Subject: RE: Geo-Environmental mold report
Please Please,
Let's get this project started at least. We can keep
discussion the past and the future and I agree that it's better
to have a complete plan, but if we can at least
agree on what the first step is in terms of construction, we can
get it done immediately. Not ideal way to progress, but some
progress is better than no progress.
Step 1 is addressing the windows right? If yes, let's agree on
the proper method for that and get that done asap
thanks
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009
2:24 PM
To: 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Lior Noy'; 'Sal Baudone'
Cc: 'JS'; 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: RE: Geo-Environmental mold report
I agree some progress is better than no progress. The first
four tasks are:
(1) Have Sal examine the cement footing in the basement and
confirm it was reinforced per the Pelham Building's verbal
instructions on February 12. Sal will need to uncover part of
the top two cinder blocks to see if they are new or simply
patched. We discussed this when Sal and Lior visited the site
March 12, one month later.
(2) Replace the chimney extension with pressure treated wood;
install flue extensions, prepare chimney cap, and apply stone
veneer per Trevor's plan. This work should be done now so we can
take down the 28 foot scaffolding on the front of our house that
has been unused since January 17th. Both the scaffolding and the
unfinished chimney are hazards and eyesores. Lior had proposed
that this work would be complete by March 6.
(3) Remove the large pile of construction debris that has
accumulated in our driveway since November, 2008. This was also
supposed to be done by March 6.
(4) Apply some temporary measures to protect the exposed
exterior walls and seams from the heavy rains expected in April.
Accomplishing these steps now rather than later would be
greatly appreciated.
Michael
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009
3:48 PM
To: 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Lior Noy'; 'Sal Baudone'
Cc: 'JS'; 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: Addtional action items - early April, 2009
Further to the four tasks I mentioned earlier today that can
be started immediately, I wanted to follow up on a few other
lingering issues that need to be resolved for us to progress:
(a) Mayan, you mentioned step 1 is addressing the windows. I
cc'd you on an email to Sal sent Sunday requesting more details
on his window wrapping plan, including whether he could warranty
the approach was consistent with NYS building code.
(b) Last Friday afternoon, March 27, the interior painter
"dropped in" unannounced. Only my eight year old
daughter and her nanny were home. As requested in the past,
Meggan and I would appreciate former subcontractors NOT entering
our property or going through the house without MyHome notifying
us in advance. This is simply a common courtesy and safety
precaution. Sal Baudone is welcome to visit whenever he needs
to.
(c) Can you give us an ETA on the reimbursement check for
$3,387? The last we heard from you on this matter was March 15
when you stated, "I need Yoel to approve it and he didn't
yet. As soon as he will, we will cut the check."
(d) Has anyone heard from National Grange Insurance re: the
results of their March 2, 2009 inspection?
(e) When the Pelham building inspector came to our house last
month, he was annoyed that his stamped plans were not on site.
We've discussed Michael Palmentiero returning these plans
several times in the past. Can this please be arranged? I would
rather not upset the building inspector further.
Michael
From: Mayan Metzler [mailto:mmetzler@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009
2:59 AM
To: Mackay, Michael; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS; Mackay, Meggan
Subject: RE: Addtional action items - early April, 2009
Sal,
I think the first question is most important. Is it something
you can answer? J please call Sal to confirm he received this
email and ask him to answer asap
Please see my response about the rest
thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 3:48 PM
To: Mayan Metzler; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS; Mackay, Meggan
Subject: Addtional action items - early April, 2009
Further to the four tasks I mentioned earlier today that can
be started immediately, I wanted to follow up on a few other
lingering issues that need to be resolved for us to progress:
(a) Mayan, you mentioned step 1 is addressing the windows. I
cc'd you on an email to Sal sent Sunday requesting more details
on his window wrapping plan, including whether he could warranty
the approach was consistent with NYS building code.
(b) Last Friday afternoon, March 27, the interior painter
"dropped in" unannounced. Only my eight year old
daughter and her nanny were home. As requested in the past,
Meggan and I would appreciate former subcontractors NOT entering
our property or going through the house without MyHome notifying
us in advance. This is simply a common courtesy and safety
precaution. Sal Baudone is welcome to visit whenever he needs
to. Agreed, unacceptable
(c) Can you give us an ETA on the reimbursement check for
$3,387? The last we heard from you on this matter was March 15
when you stated, "I need Yoel to approve it and he didn't
yet. As soon as he will, we will cut the check." I'll talk
to Yoel again, we'll do our best, very tough times as you know.
(d) Has anyone heard from National Grange Insurance re: the
results of their March 2, 2009 inspection? I don't think so,
Lior or J do you have their contact info to follow up?
(e) When the Pelham building inspector came to our house last
month, he was annoyed that his stamped plans were not on site.
We've discussed Michael Palmentiero returning these plans
several times in the past. Can this please be arranged? I would
rather not upset the building inspector further. Agreed, where
are the plans? Let's get a set to the site asap
Michael
From: Mayan Metzler [mailto:mmetzler@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009
3:01 AM
To: Mackay, Michael; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS; Mackay, Meggan
Subject: RE: Geo-Environmental mold report
Sal,
Can you start on the below immediately?
Thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 2:24 PM
To: Mayan Metzler; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS; Mackay, Meggan
Subject: RE: Geo-Environmental mold report
I agree some progress is better than no progress. The first
four tasks are:
(1) Have Sal examine the cement footing in the basement and
confirm it was reinforced per the Pelham Building's verbal
instructions on February 12. Sal will need to uncover part of
the top two cinder blocks to see if they are new or simply
patched. We discussed this when Sal and Lior visited the site
March 12, one month later.
(2) Replace the chimney extension with pressure treated wood;
install flue extensions, prepare chimney cap, and apply stone
veneer per Trevor's plan. This work should be done now so we can
take down the 28 foot scaffolding on the front of our house that
has been unused since January 17th. Both the scaffolding and the
unfinished chimney are hazards and eyesores. Lior had proposed
that this work would be complete by March 6.
(3) Remove the large pile of construction debris that has
accumulated in our driveway since November, 2008. This was also
supposed to be done by March 6.
(4) Apply some temporary measures to protect the exposed
exterior walls and seams from the heavy rains expected in April.
Accomplishing these steps now rather than later would be
greatly appreciated.
Michael
From: Sal Baudone [mailto:salb@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009
1:46 PM
To: Mackay, Michael
Cc: Mayan Metzler
Subject: RE: Additional action items - early April, 2009
Michael,
First off sorry it took so long to get back to you.
Regarding the method I would like to perform on the existing
windows: What I am suggesting is an overkill by other standards,
by using flashing material in conjunction with the sealer this
will allow the same protection as on a roof valley area. It will
be a greater means of cover over the conversional Tyvek or tar
paper. This method will also allow us the ability not to totally
remove the windows and protect from unnecessary damage to the
window and the stucco which are in place. I also feel very
strongly that when I approach the town building official with
this solution he should be more than satisfied and may even
think it was an excess measure for repair.
Also, I will be meeting with the site contractors this week
to review course of actions to be taken on the home.
Thanks
Sal
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009
8:16 PM
To: 'Sal Baudone'
Cc: 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: Window and French door wrapping proposal
Good evening, Sal, and thank you for your Saturday email. A
few important points:
Due diligence requires we ask for specific details on
materials and installation regarding any work performed by
MyHome. Although this may seem to you bothersome, it is simply
the result of our painful experience that MyHome's "degree
of workmanship falls below the minimum levels of care and
responsibility that needs to be applied to a project," to
quote our Engineer's report of December 22, 2008 (page 6). I am
not asserting MyHome's workmanship is sub-par on all it's
projects - just ours. You have already seen some examples. I can
provide many more if you like.
We will try to keep our requests for details as focused as
possible. For instance, many questions from my March 29
regarding your window-sheathing proposal can be answered with a
simple "Yes" or "No." We really would prefer
you provide detailed technical specifications whose merits can
be objectively evaluated (and used for monitoring compliance),
as opposed to vague assurances that something is
"overkill" or "excessive" or will leave the
building inspector "more than satisfied." In fact,
such vague assurances sound exactly like our previous
subcontractors who not only botched the second floor addition,
but managed to ruin our existing first floor as well. I'm sure
you can understand our skepticism.
In addition to clear, technical specifications, the only
assurance we need from MyHome is written certification that the
proposed work complies with NY building code. This should make
your job very easy, although perhaps more expensive than you
might prefer.
I've repeated below my questions regarding the window
sheathing, which I am hoping you can now address.
Many thanks,
Michael
P.S. Is this week's meeting with the site contractors going
to occur at the site? If so, I would appreciate your telling me
the day and approximate time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sal Baudone [mailto:salb@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 1:46 PM
To: Mackay, Michael
Cc: Mayan Metzler
Subject: RE: Additional action items - early April, 2009
Michael,
First off sorry it took so long to get back to you.
Regarding the method I would like to perform on the existing
windows: What I am suggesting is an overkill by other standards,
by using flashing material in conjunction with the sealer this
will allow the same protection as on a roof valley area. It will
be a greater means of cover over the conversional Tyvek or tar
paper. This method will also allow us the ability not to totally
remove the windows and protect from unnecessary damage to the
window and the stucco which are in place. I also feel very
strongly that when I approach the town building official with
this solution he should be more than satisfied and may even
think it was an excess measure for repair.
Also, I will be meeting with the site contractors this week
to review course of actions to be taken on the home.
Thanks
Sal
-----Original Message-----
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2009 1:17 PM
To: 'Sal Baudone'
Cc: 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Lior Noy'; 'Mackay, Meggan'; 'J@myhomeus.com'
Subject: RE: 42 Maple ave. - window wrapping proposal
Sal, neither my engineer nor the Pelham Building Inspector
understand your proposed solution to the wrapping problem:
"Remove the casing trim from the inside of the home and
flash the unit from the inside using galvanized flashing and tar
caulking to complete a seal to the 2x4 studs. This method will
utilize the standard of step flashing that we incorporate when
flashing a roofline. This method is also a Anderson window
recommendation. After the flashing is complete foam insulation
can be applied to the opening as to further seal the flashing
against the DF timber. Then the trim can be reapplied."
We need a few more details:
1. Would the galvanized flashing cover the interior wall,
window cavity and exterior wall in one piece? If so, how many
inches would overlap onto the inside and outside walls?
2. Would the galvanized flashing be applied on top of or
underneath the sheet rock?
3. Would the flashing be applied on top of or beneath the
existing layers of stucco?
4. While tar caulking may be appropriate for exterior roof
flashing, is it appropriate for sealing to wall studs?
What brand/product did you have in mind?
5. How would this method be applied to the bottom edges of
the French doors?
6. Could you supply a link or fax us a copy of the Anderson
spec endorsing this approach?
7. Can you get an architect (e.g., Trevor Spearman) to do a
rough sketch for the building inspector's and engineer's review
and approval?
As mentioned in previous emails, we would like confirmation
that this approach complies with NY State Code requirements for
new construction, particularly Chapter R7.
We are still awaiting your proposal for addressing the lack
of proper sheathing at the building corners, including the seams
where the dormer meets the main portion of the second floor.
Finally, I am disturbed by the abrupt departure from your
original findings on March 12 when you visited the site,
reviewed photographs, and told Lior and me, "The windows
need to come out." My concern, of course, is that your
initial recommendation was for the "right" approach
while your current proposal is for the "inexpensive"
approach. Any assurances to the contrary would be appreciated.
Michael
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009
9:13 AM
To: 'Sal Baudone'; 'JS'
Cc: 'Mackay, Meggan'; 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Lior Noy'
Subject: National Grange Insurance Report
Sal, any follow up to Mayan's question (below) re: starting
up on immediate tasks? In particular, the large pile of
construction debris in our driveway since last November is
starting to smell and our neighbors are taking offense.
J, any progress finding the results of National Grange's
March 2 inspection?
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Mayan Metzler [mailto:mmetzler@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2009 3:01 AM
To: Mackay, Michael; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Cc: JS; Mackay, Meggan
Subject: RE: Geo-Environmental mold report
Sal,
Can you start on the below immediately?
Thanks
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009
9:27 PM
To: 'Mayan Metzler'
Cc: 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: RE: National Grange Insurance Report
Mayan, any chance of Sal getting started on any of the
immediate issues some time this week?
Any information would be greatly appreciated.
Michael
From: Mayan Metzler [mailto:mmetzler@myhomeus.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15,
2009 12:09 AM
To: Mackay, Michael
Cc: Mackay, Meggan; Lior Noy; Sal Baudone
Subject: RE: National Grange Insurance Report
Hi Michael,
Our plan is to start on Thursday if possible. Sal will be
there to get the subs started. We will provide further updates
as they become available
thanks,
Mayan
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, April 15,
2009 11:24 AM
To: 'Mayan Metzler'; 'Sal Baudone'
Cc: 'Mackay, Meggan'; 'Lior Noy'
Subject: RE: National Grange Insurance Report
Thank you, Mayan, Thursday would be great. Sal, let me know
when you're sending a dumpster to remove the large pile of
debris so I can get my mini-van out of the way.
Michael
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009
9:46 AM
To: 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: MyHome Reviews on the WWW
Good morning, my love. Happened upon some of the following.
NOT very encouraging.
Mm
---------------------------------
4 years ago we made the mistake of choosing My Home
Renovations for the gut renovation of our 1 bedroom apt. After
the great sell, they certainly failed to deliver. We were
disappointed at the time of completion and have since become
angrier as years gone by. They didn't seal off the walls behind
the kitchen and bath, leaving gaping holes into the bowels of
our 200 unit building--yes, you guessed it, 4 years of rodent
problems. The tile in the bathroom is already coming loose and
falling off the walls. They failed to "square off"
several walls on the interior, so everything looks just a little
off, and you would have thought our wood floor was the first
floor they ever laid, because the gaps that were noticeable
then, are only getting bigger. I was told then by a supervisor
that "after a while, the natural dirt and debris that
accumulates" will make those gaps less noticeable. We had a
pocket door installed, and when it fell out of the wall, the new
contractor informed us that MY HOME installed a pocket door, but
failed to include the frame to house it in!!! Believe me, we
should have fired this contractor and brought a lawsuit. By the
time they completed the project they were 4 months past their
estimated date for completion and we just wanted them to go
AWAY!
-------------------------------------------------------
We worked with My Home's Westchester location and it was
nothing short of a disaster. They designed our kitchen and we
ordered custom cabinets through them. The good part: the
cabinets are of superb quality. The bad part: every single step
in the process. They made a number of design mistakes (e.g.,
designing cabinets to be 96" high when our floor to ceiling
measurement is only 95". After 5... more
Posted by Unhappy with My Home on November 03, 2008
----------------------------------------------------
Disastrous - Zero Stars
Used for kitchen design and cabinets. In a nutshell: delivery
timeframes unrealistic, untimely responses, zero accountability
and inability to do anything smoothly.... more
Posted by Citysearch user on June 17, 2008
----------------------------------------------------
Never ending nightmare.
Not recommended by any stretch of the imagination. MYHOME has
(like their phony reviews below) a terrific come on, totally
professional and masters of...
From citysearch.com on 12/28/2007
Worst Company Ever
Do not trust this company. They do not do what they
advertise. Their designers are generally unprofessional. Other
than their ability to convince you ...
From citysearch.com on 12/26/2007
Worst EVER
My home renovated our kitchen - If they were the last company
on earth doing renovations I would not use them again. We were
assigned to a designer wh...
From citysearch.com on 12/10/2007
STAY AWAY! DO NOT GET DUPED INTO USING MYHOME.
Their sales pitch sounds great: free design consultation;
fixed price labor contract; they arrange everything for you;
they schedule everthing to get ...
From citysearch.com on 7/22/2007
DO NOT HIRE MY HOME TO RENOVATE YOUR APARTMENT - YOU WILL
REGRET IT!!!
The only thing I can say is that the other reviews on this
web site are correct: DO NOT HIRE MY HOME TO RENOVATE YOUR
APARTMENT. DITTO to what the oth...
From citysearch.com on 4/26/2007
PLEASE DO NOT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE WE DID!!
I had a small bathroom renovation that I hired these guys
for. They said it would take three weeks. I have done renovation
in NYC before, and after 5 ...
From citysearch.com on 9/21/2006
False advertising, serious customer neglect
I interviewed 3 bathroom design consultants before choosing
MyHome. I chose MyHome because I was told that the entire
bathroom renovations would take ...
From citysearch.com on 9/7/2006
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009
3:52 PM
To: 'Morrell I. Berkowitz'
Subject: RE: retainer MacKay with MY Home matter
I'd like to get it to you now, if possible. I can walk down
from Debevoise and be there in about 10 minutes.
I had a rather precipitous falling out with MyHome's current
Project Manager and our former General Contractor, who showed up
at the house this afternoon to prepare to go to work. On their
terms.
I need to make it very clear to them that there services are
no longer required, and that they should not come to the house.
Should that email come from me or from you?
-----Original Message-----
From: Morrell I. Berkowitz [mailto:mib@gdblaw.com]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 3:47 PM
To: Mackay, Michael
Subject: RE: retainer MacKay with MY Home matter
Yes. Do you want to do that today or Monday. Anytime Monday
is ok for me, just let me know so I can alert security.
Have a great weekend.
Office is on third ave betw. 51st and 52nd street 1 block
east of 51st Lexington ave subway station.
Morrell I. Berkowitz, Esq.
Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP
845 Third Avenue 8th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10022
(212) 935-3131 x303
direct fax (212) 935-4511
From: Mackay, Michael
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009
11:15 AM
To: 'Mackay, Meggan'
Subject: Recap of April 17, 2009 events at 42 Maple
Hi, Meggan,
Thursday I received a telephone message from Lior saying Sal
and company would come to the house at noon, Friday, April 17,
to begin work on the "immediate tasks" agreed to back
on April 1 (chimney extension redo, basement pillar check, etc.
- see thread below). Yesterday, Sal showed up about noon,
followed by Michael Palmentiero. Michael Palmentiero? Lior had
told me Angelo was coming to the house to start the chimney
work.
Anyway, after 10 minutes I decided to go out and see what
they were talking about. Found them in the back yard discussing
the windows and French doors. I asked them what the plan was and
Michael said he was bringing in a crew next week to start fixing
the windows. I mentioned to Sal that wasn't what we agreed to,
since I was still waiting for him to provide details on how the
work was to be done and whether his proposal was up to code.
(Even the contractor from Prutting & Co. didn't understand
Sal's plan.) Sal's reply was that more detail "wasn't
necessary." At this point we both became frustrated.
Michael walked away, and I pressed Sal for details on exactly
what sheathing treatment he was planning. He eventually
explained he wanted to slip flat pieces of aluminum flashing
between the windows and doors from the inside, and that the
flashing would not wrap around either the inside or (more
importantly) the outside edge of the walls. I told him this was
not acceptable because it left an exposed seam between the
aluminum and the tar paper under the exterior trim. At this
point we both lost patience. I told Sal "Look, I'm sorry
but this just isn't working out." After verifying they
would not need access to the house, I left for NY. Lorna was in
the house to keep an eye on things. She mentioned Sal and
Michael stayed for a long time discussing details.
I hope you agree that it is finally time to move on.
Michael |